Doubtful receivables at a hotel: when an unpaid agency or company invoice can be treated as doubtful
Learn when a hotel receivable qualifies as doubtful under Article 323 of the Tax Procedure Law. This guide covers the required evidence folder, reminder steps, and credit limits for agency and company debts.
Contents
Key takeaways
- Article 323 of the Tax Procedure Law treats a receivable at the lawsuit or enforcement stage as doubtful, provided it relates to earning and maintaining commercial income (Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, Vergi Usul Kanunu Madde 323).
- A firm reminder is evidence, not a stage: the file only reaches the point the law names when enforcement or a lawsuit begins.
- The hotel's real work is the folder: contract, vouchers, ledger extract, invoices, every reminder and every reply, in date order.
- An account that has passed its credit limit without a payment plan should stop receiving new credit charges, whatever the collection file says.
- Whether a specific balance qualifies, and what it does to the accounts, is the accountant's decision, not the front office's.
A hotel receivable counts as doubtful when it is at the lawsuit or enforcement stage and it arose from earning and maintaining commercial income. Article 323 of the Tax Procedure Law names those conditions; a reminder alone does not meet them. This article follows the lawsuit and enforcement route; the law also names other conditions, such as bankruptcy, which we do not cover here. Whether your file qualifies, and the tax effect, is your accountant's call.
An agency's invoice for a group stay is four months old, the reservations team is still taking its bookings, and the accountant asks for the file. What the hotel can produce that afternoon decides how the next step goes. After reading this article you will know when the law treats a receivable as doubtful, what belongs in the evidence folder, how to run a reminder ladder, when to stop selling to the debtor, and what to hand your accountant.
Why does selling to agencies and companies create a receivables problem?
Because the hotel hands over the room before the money arrives, and the gap between delivery and payment is where a receivable turns into a loss.
Charges that leave the guest folio and sit on a company or agency account form the city ledger: the guest has gone home and the balance has not. The two debtor types behave differently. A travel agency settles per booking or per period, often against an allotment, while a corporate client is invoiced monthly under a signed agreement.
Exposure grows quietly, because every new reservation adds to the same account while the old balance stays open and nobody re-reads the total. The service has already been consumed: there is no room to take back, no key to deactivate, no stay to cancel.
Three departments touch the same money. Reservations sells, front office posts, accounting collects, and without one named owner the balance simply ages. Ageing buckets, current, 30, 60, 90 days and beyond, are the cheapest early warning a hotel has, provided someone reads them weekly rather than at year end.
When does an unpaid invoice count as a doubtful receivable?
Under Article 323 of the Tax Procedure Law, a receivable at the lawsuit or enforcement stage counts as doubtful, provided it relates to earning and maintaining commercial income.
A doubtful receivable (şüpheli alacak) is a receivable whose collection has become doubtful. The term describes a stage, not a mood. The text of Article 323 (opens in a new tab) sets two conditions for the route this article follows: the receivable is at the lawsuit or enforcement stage, and it arose from earning and maintaining commercial or agricultural income.
A hotel's agency or company invoice normally sits inside the second condition, because the room was sold in the course of the business and the folder described below proves it. The article lists more than one situation; this article follows the one route we could read in full, the lawsuit or enforcement stage, and does not describe the others.
A phone call, an email, a stern letter or an internal note does not by itself put a receivable at that stage; only the proceedings do. Whether a given receivable meets the conditions Article 323 sets is your accountant's call, so no figure is printed here.
The trigger is procedural rather than calendar-based, which is why a file can be a year old and still not qualify, or reach the stage quickly once proceedings start. How the balance is recorded in the hotel's chart of accounts is the accountant's side of that decision.
Key pointThe two conditions, stated plainly
Article 323 of the Tax Procedure Law treats a receivable as doubtful when (1) it is at the lawsuit or enforcement stage, and (2) it arose from earning and maintaining commercial income. Source: Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, Vergi Usul Kanunu Madde 323 (Şüpheli alacaklar), 12 November 2026.
What belongs in the evidence folder?
One folder per debtor, opened with the first invoice rather than after the first missed payment, holding every document that shows the debt exists and was demanded.
The contract or agency agreement comes first: rates, payment terms, who is authorised to book, and how disputes are handled. Reservation vouchers and confirmations follow, with the group name or guest names, so the service delivered can be matched to the invoice. The folio and the city-ledger extract show charges, payments received and the running balance at a stated date.
Invoices need date, number and amount, plus proof of delivery: the email, the courier receipt, or the electronic invoice record. Every reminder and every reply belongs in the folder, in date order, including the ones that produced nothing. Any enforcement or court document, once it exists, carries the file number, date and type of proceeding.
Keep a one-page summary on top so anyone can see the position at a glance.
Checklist
- Contract or agency agreement
- Reservation vouchers and confirmations
- Folio and city-ledger extract
- Invoices with proof of delivery
- Every reminder and reply, in date order
- Enforcement or court documents
- One-page summary: total invoiced, paid, outstanding, days overdue, last contact
What should a reminder ladder look like?
A ladder is a fixed sequence of contacts, each one written down, so the file shows a steady, documented demand instead of scattered calls nobody can date.
Step one is a call to the debtor's finance contact, logged with the date, the name and what was said. Step two is the statement of account by email, with the invoice copies attached, so the debtor cannot claim it never saw the detail. Step three is a formal written notice (ihtar) by email and courier, with a stated deadline and a named person to contact. Step four is a notary notice (noter ihtarı), which creates a dated official record that does not depend on the debtor acknowledging an email.
Step five is enforcement (icra) or a lawsuit. From that moment the file carries a number and a date, which is what the law's condition looks for. If the debt is backed by a cheque or a promissory note, the collection route differs from a plain invoice, so ask your legal adviser which instrument you actually hold.
| Step | What it is | What it adds to the file |
|---|---|---|
| Phone call | Logged contact with finance | Date, name, what was said |
| Statement of account | Email with invoice copies | Proof the debtor received the detail |
| Written notice | Formal demand with a deadline | A dated demand |
| Notary notice | Official notice by notary | A dated record independent of the debtor |
| Enforcement or lawsuit | Legal proceedings | A file number and a date, the stage Article 323 names |
Each rung costs money and costs the relationship. The ladder is worth agreeing before the first arrears, when nobody is angry.
When should a hotel stop selling to the debtor?
When the account passes its agreed credit limit or its payment term without a payment plan, new charges should stop going onto it.
Set a credit limit per agency and per company before the season, in writing, and state what happens when it is reached. Two levers exist: refuse new credit sales, or keep selling on prepayment or a deposit, which protects the relationship while protecting the cash.
Name the person who may override the limit, and require a written reason that is logged, otherwise the limit is decoration. Keep the commercial decision separate from the collection file: stopping sales must never look like writing the debt off.
Read the agency contract before you act, because offsetting against future commissions or a deposit may be allowed, and the terms decide how. Watch for the quiet version of the problem, where a debtor pays just enough to stay under the limit while the oldest invoice never clears. The same discipline sits inside the wider question of tour operator payment risk.
TipA rule you can adopt this week
One credit limit per debtor, one named person who can override it, one written reason logged each time, and prepayment as the default once the limit is reached.
What should you hand your accountant, and when?
Hand over the complete folder at the moment the receivable reaches enforcement or the lawsuit stage, not months later and not before.
Bring the folder described above, plus the enforcement or court reference and a ledger extract drawn at that date. Timing matters because the accountant has to see the receivable at the stage the law names, on the date it happened, not reconstructed afterwards.
The accountant decides whether the conditions Article 323 sets are met, and decides the provision and its tax effect; the hotel supplies facts, not conclusions. The hotel keeps working after handover: recording payments, updating the balance, and reporting any partial payment or settlement immediately. If a settlement is agreed after the file has been handed over, say so the same week, because the file the accountant relied on has changed.
Keep the folder after the matter closes; the same documents answer questions in an inspection years later. How these balances travel from the front desk into the accounting records is covered in hotel bookkeeping in Türkiye.
Watch outWhat this article cannot decide
Whether a specific balance meets Article 323, how a provision is measured and recorded, the tax effect, and the timing of any write-off all belong to your accountant or legal adviser, with the folder in front of them.
What to do next
Pick the oldest open agency or company account on your city ledger this week, build the folder for it in the order this article gives, and set a written credit limit before the next contract is signed. The folder is what turns an awkward conversation into a decision your accountant can act on.
Frequently asked questions
Does a written reminder make a receivable doubtful?
No. A reminder is evidence that the hotel demanded payment, and it belongs in the folder, but the route described here needs the receivable to be at the lawsuit or enforcement stage. Article 323 lists more than one situation, so ask your accountant which one your file could fall under.
How long should a hotel wait before starting enforcement?
No fixed waiting period is stated in the text this article relies on; the decision depends on the contract's payment terms, the size of the balance, the credit limit and the relationship. What matters is that the folder is complete before proceedings start, so the file is not assembled in a hurry afterwards.
Can the hotel write off an agency debt itself?
Writing off and providing for a receivable are accounting and tax decisions, not operational ones. The hotel's job is to keep the ledger accurate and the folder complete; the accountant decides what is recorded and when, and the tax effect follows from that decision.
What happens if the agency pays part of the invoice?
The unpaid remainder is the balance in question, so the ledger extract must show the payment and the date it arrived. Record any payment plan in writing, and tell the accountant about it, because a partial payment changes both the amount and the picture of whether collection is doubtful.
Why does a signed agency contract matter for the file?
It shows the receivable arose from the hotel's commercial activity, which is the second condition Article 323 names, and it sets the payment terms, the person authorised to book and how disputes are handled. Without it, the hotel argues from invoices alone.
Sources
- Vergi Usul Kanunu, Madde 323 (Şüpheli alacaklar) (opens in a new tab)Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığımevzuat.gov.tr